You know that moment when you discover something amazing and immediately want to grab everyone by the shoulders and ask why they didn’t tell you about it sooner? That happened to me about two years ago when I was scrolling through Amazon Prime at 11 PM on a Tuesday, procrastinating on grading essays, and stumbled across “Tales from the Loop.” I’d never heard anyone mention it. Not my sci-fi obsessed colleagues, not the online communities I lurk in, nobody.
Turns out some of the most brilliant science fiction on television gets buried under the avalanche of whatever’s currently trending. While everyone’s debating the latest big-budget space epic or arguing about which superhero show jumped the shark, these incredible series are quietly exploring ideas that’ll have you lying awake wondering what happens when technology nudges humanity just slightly off course.
I’ve been hunting down these hidden treasures for years now, partly because I’m constitutionally incapable of letting quality storytelling disappear without a fight, but mostly because I can’t stand watching my students get stuck thinking sci-fi is just explosions and CGI aliens. The underrated stuff? That’s where the real risks happen. That’s where writers ask the uncomfortable questions that mainstream productions won’t touch.
“Counterpart” from 2017 is probably the best example of this. Somehow flew completely under most people’s radar, which makes me genuinely angry because it’s hands down the smartest take on parallel dimensions I’ve ever encountered. Instead of flashy portal effects or universe-hopping adventures, it’s about a boring office building where bureaucrats manage communication between two nearly identical Earths. The brilliance is in how it explores identity by having characters meet their other selves — not dramatically different versions, but people who made slightly different choices along the way.
J.K. Simmons plays both versions of the main character, and watching him confront his other self’s life decisions is genuinely unsettling in ways I’m still processing. The show gets something most sci-fi completely misses — the technology isn’t the interesting part. The interesting part is watching people adapt to impossible situations. When you can see exactly how your life might have gone differently, what does that do to your sense of self? I spent weeks afterward thinking about my own sliding doors moments, like what would have happened if I’d taken that job in Portland instead of staying in Philly.
Then there’s “Tales from the Loop,” which Amazon buried so thoroughly I only found it during one of those late-night scrolling sessions when you’re avoiding everything you should actually be doing. Based on Simon Stålenhag’s artwork, it presents this world where strange machines have quietly integrated into rural American life. Kids discover robots in the forest. Time behaves weirdly in certain locations. People age backwards, float around, or just vanish entirely.
The restraint is what makes it brilliant. These aren’t explosive sci-fi concepts — they’re gentle mysteries that unfold like stories your weird uncle might tell about growing up in a place where the impossible was just Tuesday. Each episode feels like folklore. The show never explains its science, which should be frustrating but instead feels incredibly refreshing. Sometimes the best sci-fi trusts you to fill in the blanks with your own imagination rather than spoon-feeding exposition.
“Devs” got some critical attention but never found the audience it deserved, which is a crime because Alex Garland created something genuinely mind-bending. Eight episodes about a tech company building a quantum computer that can simulate anything — past, present, future. The premise alone should have had people obsessing over it for months, but somehow it got lost in the streaming noise.
The show tackles free will versus determinism in ways that made me simultaneously thrilled and terrified. I won’t spoil it, but watching characters grapple with seeing their own futures play out on screen creates this incredible tension between hope and inevitability that I’m still thinking about. Also, the visual design of the quantum computer — this golden cube suspended in a redwood forest — is one of those images that just lives in your head forever.
I have to mention “Raised by Wolves,” which HBO Max canceled after two seasons despite it being absolutely bonkers in the best possible way. Ridley Scott executive produced this story about androids raising human children on a distant planet, and it commits so completely to its bizarre premise that you can’t help getting swept along. The androids have religious conflicts. Ancient serpents show up. Characters switch sides so often you need a flowchart to keep track.
It’s messy and weird and probably too ambitious for its own good, but that’s exactly why I loved it. Too many sci-fi shows play everything safe, but “Raised by Wolves” threw everything at the wall just to see what would stick. Not all of it worked — some of it definitely didn’t work — but when it did work, it was unlike anything else on television.
“The OA” falls into similar territory. Netflix canceled it after two seasons, leaving fans (myself very much included) genuinely furious about the unresolved storylines. Prairie Johnson returns after being missing for seven years, claiming she can travel between dimensions through interpretive dance. I know how that sounds — trust me, I know — but the show earns its weirdness through completely committed performances and plot developments that actually surprise you.
The problem with shows like these is they require patience from both audiences and networks. They’re building toward something larger than individual episodes, exploring ideas that don’t always wrap up neatly in forty-two minutes. “Dark,” the German Netflix series about time travel, managed to survive for three seasons and actually deliver a complete story, but it took real commitment to follow its plotting across multiple timelines and generations of families.
What all these shows share is respect for their audiences’ intelligence. They don’t spoon-feed explanations or dumb down complex concepts for mass appeal. Instead, they trust viewers to engage with challenging ideas about technology, identity, consciousness, and what it means to be human when the rules have shifted just enough to make everything uncertain.
I keep a running list of shows like these — partly for my own sanity but mostly because I can’t stand the thought of quality storytelling disappearing into the streaming void. These aren’t just entertaining television; they’re expanding what the medium can do with science fiction concepts, proving that TV can handle big ideas without sacrificing character development or emotional truth.
Next time someone asks for recommendations, skip the obvious choices everyone’s already talking about. Hunt down these buried treasures instead. Your brain will thank you, even if your sleep schedule definitely won’t. And hey, maybe if enough of us start talking about the good stuff that gets overlooked, the networks will notice that there’s actually an audience for sci-fi that treats its viewers like intelligent adults capable of handling complex ideas.
0 Comments