I keep thinking about this one Friday night in 2003 when I was seventeen, wandering through the sci-fi section of Hollywood Video with absolutely no plan whatsoever. You know that feeling when you’re just browsing, running your fingers along those plastic cases, hoping something will jump out at you? That’s how I found *Silent Running* – this beat-up VHS with cover art that looked like it had survived a nuclear war. The back of the box described some guy alone on a spaceship trying to save Earth’s last forests, and something about that premise just grabbed me.
I took it home, popped it in the VCR (God, that satisfying mechanical *thunk* when you pushed the tape down), and spent the next ninety minutes completely absorbed in this melancholy meditation on isolation and environmental destruction. It wasn’t flashy or action-packed – just this quiet, thoughtful story that stuck with me for weeks afterward. I probably never would’ve discovered it any other way, and that random encounter shaped my taste in sci-fi more than I realized at the time.
Fast-forward twenty years and I’m scrolling through Netflix at 11 PM, paralyzed by infinite choice. Everything looks the same in those little thumbnail images, and the algorithm keeps pushing the same big-budget series everyone’s already talking about. Where’s the serendipity? Where’s the chance to stumble onto something weird and wonderful that nobody else has heard of?
Don’t get me wrong – streaming has revolutionized access to sci-fi in amazing ways. My students can now watch *Blade Runner* and *The Matrix* and *Children of Men* whenever they want, which is incredible for classroom discussions. When we did our dystopian fiction unit last month, kids were pulling references from shows I’d never even heard of, mixing Korean sci-fi films with British anthology series with obscure American indie movies. The breadth of what’s available is staggering.
But something fundamental shifted when we moved away from physical media, and I’m still processing what we lost in translation.
The whole experience used to be different, you know? Choosing a movie required actual commitment. You had to drive somewhere, browse actual shelves, make a decision, pay money, drive home. If you picked something terrible, you were kind of stuck with it – or at least, you felt obligated to give it a real chance since you’d invested time and money. That friction forced you to engage more deeply with whatever you chose.
I remember buying the special edition DVD of *Blade Runner* (yes, I’m one of those people who could talk about that movie for hours) specifically for the documentary about its production. Spending a Saturday afternoon watching Ridley Scott explain his vision, then diving into deleted scenes, then rewatching the film with director’s commentary – it felt like a complete immersion in that fictional world. The bonus features weren’t just extras; they were part of the storytelling experience.
Streaming flattened all that. Everything became equally accessible, which sounds great in theory but created this weird paradox where nothing feels special anymore. I can watch *The Expanse* on my phone during lunch break or binge *Black Mirror* episodes while folding laundry. The convenience is undeniable, but it also makes everything feel disposable.
My students experience this differently than I do, obviously. They’ve never known scarcity when it comes to entertainment options. When I assign *1984* and suggest they watch the 1984 film adaptation, they just pull it up on their laptops without a second thought. No waiting, no hunting, no building anticipation. It’s just… there.
Sometimes I wonder if that instant gratification changes how they engage with the material. When you have to seek something out, when there’s effort involved in finding it, you bring different expectations to the viewing experience. You’re more likely to stick with something challenging, more willing to let a slow-building story develop at its own pace.
Case in point: I showed my AP class *A Boy and His Dog* last year – this weird, dark post-apocalyptic film from 1975 that I’d discovered in that same video store where I found *Silent Running*. Half the students were confused and turned off by its pacing and tone. They’re so accustomed to the rapid-fire editing and constant stimulation of contemporary sci-fi that they struggled with something more deliberate and strange.
Yet the students who connected with it really *connected* – they wrote these passionate analysis papers about masculinity and survival and the relationship between civilization and barbarism. The film divided the room in ways that more accessible sci-fi never does. That’s what I miss about the video store era: you encountered things that challenged you, not just things that algorithms predicted you’d like.
The algorithm thing bothers me more than it probably should. Netflix knows I watch sci-fi, so it keeps suggesting variations on themes I’ve already explored. I get recommendations for space operas because I watched *The Expanse*, dystopian series because I binged *The Handmaid’s Tale*, time travel movies because I rewatched *Primer* for the hundredth time. It’s creating these feedback loops that narrow rather than expand my viewing habits.
Contrast that with browsing physical shelves where you might grab *Brazil* because the cover looked intriguing, or pick up *Coherence* because it was shelved next to something else you were considering. Random adjacency led to unexpected discoveries in ways that targeted algorithms never will.
Of course, streaming has democratized access to international and independent sci-fi in unprecedented ways. Films like *Aniara* – this haunting Swedish space epic that would never have played in American theaters during the VHS era – can now find audiences worldwide. That’s genuinely revolutionary, and it’s given us access to voices and stories that were previously invisible.
But there’s also something lost in terms of shared cultural experience. When there were fewer options and higher barriers to access, more people ended up watching the same things. You could assume that other sci-fi fans had seen *Alien* or *The Terminator* or *Star Wars* because there were only so many ways to encounter genre films. Now, with thousands of options across multiple platforms, we’re all watching different things and having fewer common reference points.
I noticed this shift in my classroom discussions. Ten years ago, I could make casual references to *The Matrix* or *Minority Report* and assume most students would get it. Now, their sci-fi literacy is simultaneously broader and more fragmented. Some have deep knowledge of obscure anime series I’ve never heard of, others are experts on Marvel movies but haven’t seen any classic sci-fi, still others discovered *Star Trek* through recent series and have no connection to the original shows.
It’s not better or worse necessarily – just different. More diverse but less cohesive.
The impermanence of streaming libraries frustrates me too. Movies appear and disappear based on licensing agreements that have nothing to do with artistic merit or cultural significance. I’ll recommend *Brazil* to a student, then discover it’s no longer available on any platform they can access. That never happened with physical media – once you owned something, you owned it permanently.
This creates a strange anxiety around viewing choices. Should I watch something immediately because it might disappear? Should I add it to my list and risk losing it? The abundance of options paradoxically creates a scarcity mentality.
Maybe I’m just being nostalgic for my teenage years when everything felt more significant because it required more effort. Maybe today’s students will have their own version of video store memories – that moment when they discovered some obscure sci-fi series through a friend’s recommendation or stumbled onto a hidden gem while browsing late at night.
But I can’t shake the feeling that something essential changed when we traded physical browsing for algorithmic curation, when we replaced the ritual of choosing and committing to a film with the endless scroll of thumbnail images. Sci-fi has always been about imagining different futures, and maybe this shift in how we consume it reflects larger changes in how we relate to culture and storytelling.
The genre itself has adapted, obviously. Shows like *Black Mirror* and *The Expanse* are designed for binge-watching in ways that earlier sci-fi wasn’t. Streaming has enabled more complex serialized storytelling, more experimental formats, more diverse voices. That’s exciting and valuable.
Still, I miss the weight of a VHS case in my hands, the anticipation of not knowing whether a random choice would be brilliant or terrible, the commitment that came with limited options. Those constraints created their own kind of magic – the magic of discovery through friction rather than convenience.
I guess what I’m really missing is the sense that finding great sci-fi required some kind of quest. Now it’s just there, waiting, abundant and immediate and somehow less precious for being so accessible.
0 Comments