Look, I’m just going to say it upfront – I have a massive soft spot for reluctant heroes in sci-fi, and I’m tired of pretending otherwise. Yeah, it’s a trope. Yeah, we’ve all seen it a thousand times. And yeah, every time some grizzled ex-soldier or burned-out hacker gets dragged kicking and screaming into saving the universe, I’m right there for it like it’s the first time I’ve ever seen this story play out.
I was at a convention panel a few years back where fans were having this heated debate about antiheroes – specifically whether Deckard from Blade Runner was a better reluctant protagonist than Joe Miller from The Expanse. The passion in that room was incredible, people getting genuinely worked up defending their favorite “I don’t want to be here but I guess I’ll save everyone anyway” character. That’s when it hit me – you don’t argue that intensely about something unless it really matters to you. These characters get under our skin in ways that traditional heroes just… don’t.
When I first played Mass Effect back in high school, I thought Commander Shepard was going to be another generic space marine. But those dialogue choices, man… even in a game where you’re literally called “the first human Spectre” and destined to save the galaxy, you could still make Shepard hesitant, questioning, sometimes downright reluctant to shoulder that responsibility. Those awkward pauses in cutscenes, the slightly uncertain delivery of certain lines – it felt more real than any gung-ho space hero had a right to.
The thing critics miss when they roll their eyes at reluctant heroes is that the reluctance isn’t the bug, it’s the feature. When Luke Skywalker whines about power converters instead of jumping at the chance for adventure, or when Neo keeps asking “why me?” in The Matrix, they’re not being annoying – they’re being human. I mean, if some old guy showed up at my apartment tomorrow telling me I was the chosen one destined to save humanity from machines, my first reaction wouldn’t be “hell yeah, let’s do this.” It’d be more like “are you insane? I have a mortgage and I was planning to binge-watch The Expanse this weekend.”
That’s what makes these characters work in sci-fi specifically. The genre throws these massive, world-ending scenarios at us – alien invasions, robot uprisings, galactic empires – and then grounds them with protagonists who react the way actual people would. With confusion, fear, and a healthy dose of “surely someone more qualified should handle this.”
I remember playing Cyberpunk 2077 when it finally got patched into something playable, and there was this whole online debate about whether V was actually a hero or just a selfish merc looking out for themselves. The fans defending V’s apathy toward Night City’s problems were fascinating to watch. They weren’t celebrating selfishness – they were celebrating authenticity. In a world that corrupt and broken, of course you’d be reluctant to stick your neck out. Of course you’d question whether any of it was worth saving.
The Mandalorian nailed this too, though I know some people think Din Djarin is just another variation on the same theme. But come on – when he finally decides to risk everything for Grogu, when this guy who just wants to collect bounties and follow his creed suddenly becomes space dad to a fifty-year-old green baby… that moment works because we spent so much time watching him not want that responsibility. The payoff only hits because of the reluctance that came before.
Stranger Things understood this perfectly with Hopper in the first season. Here’s this washed-up, alcoholic small-town cop who’s basically given up on life, and suddenly he’s facing down interdimensional monsters to save a kid he barely knows. The show could’ve made him immediately heroic, but instead they let him be human first – skeptical, overwhelmed, making mistakes. That’s what made his eventual heroism feel earned rather than expected.
Even in gaming, where you’d think the power fantasy would override the reluctance, some of the best sci-fi protagonists are the ones who question what they’re doing. Take Takeshi Kovacs from Altered Carbon – the guy gets pulled out of storage after centuries to solve a murder he couldn’t care less about, in a world he finds morally repugnant. His reluctance isn’t character weakness, it’s the lens through which we explore what immortality and body-swapping technology would actually mean for human society.
What I love about testing games for a living is that I get to see how developers try to balance player agency with character consistency. You can’t make a protagonist too eager for conflict or players feel railroaded into violence. But make them too reluctant and the gameplay loop falls apart. The best sci-fi games find that sweet spot where the character’s hesitation feels genuine but doesn’t prevent them from eventually taking action when it matters.
The reluctant hero trope works because it acknowledges something most power fantasy stories ignore – that real heroism is scary. It’s costly. It disrupts your life and forces you to become someone you might not want to be. When Geralt of Rivia grumbles about getting involved in political conflicts in The Witcher, he’s not being difficult, he’s being smart. He knows that playing hero usually ends with you dead in a ditch somewhere while the people you saved go back to their lives and forget you existed.
But here’s the thing that makes these characters ultimately satisfying rather than just frustrating – they do eventually step up. The reluctance makes their eventual heroism more meaningful, not less. When someone who clearly doesn’t want to fight finally decides something is worth fighting for, that choice carries more weight than if they’d been eager for battle from the start.
I’ve noticed this pattern in my own gaming habits too. Given the choice between playing as a confident, capable hero or a reluctant, flawed protagonist, I’ll pick the reluctant one every time. There’s something appealing about characters who have to talk themselves into doing the right thing, who question their decisions, who sometimes fail because they’re trying to stay true to their principles in an unprincipled world.
Maybe it’s because I spend my days finding bugs in games – looking for the places where systems break down, where the facade of perfection cracks. I’m naturally drawn to characters who embody those same cracks, who show the places where heroism becomes complicated and messy and real.
The reluctant hero isn’t going anywhere because we need stories that acknowledge heroism as a choice rather than a destiny. In a world where we’re constantly asked to care about everything, to be outraged about everything, to take action on everything, there’s something deeply appealing about characters who pick their battles carefully, who understand that you can’t save everyone, who recognize that sometimes the best you can do is save the person right in front of you.
So yeah, I love the reluctant hero trope, and I’m done apologizing for it. These characters remind us that heroism isn’t about being perfect or fearless or eager for conflict. It’s about doing what needs to be done even when – especially when – you really, really don’t want to.
0 Comments